Now Playing Tracks

Anonymous

Anonymous asked:

Would you judge someone for paying $500 for a video game console?

Yes, I'd think much less of someone for that

Yes, I'd judge them a little

No, it's their money so they can spend it how they like

No, that's actually a good use of money/I'd do that

apolladay:


Would you judge someone for paying $500 for a video game console?

Yes, I’d think much less of someone for that

Yes, I’d judge them a little

No, it’s their money so they can spend it how they like

No, that’s actually a good use of money/I’d do that

No??? I’ve spent that much on a console (I own a Switch 2 among other things), it’s much cheaper than a good quality PC (which I also own) and while it’s a lot of money at once, there’s a lot of interests and hobbies that probably add up to around the same costs. I spend an embarrassing amount of time every year playing video games so at least for me personally that $500 gives me a ton of hours of entertainment, so it ends up being really cost effective.

I mean I also recently spent $100 on limited edition MTG cards with Sonic characters on them so I of all people cannot judge someone for the money they spend on interests/hobbies anyway lol.

anonpolls:

Do you ever feel like someone who followed you is in the wrong place? Or is disappointed by the things you put on your blog (as in like they didn’t purposely follow you because they dislike it and want to start shit they just didn’t seem to know what your blog would be and won’t unfollow you)?

Yes

No

Results

See Results

Thanks, Anon!


-submit your poll!-

Y'all if you don’t want to follow my blog anymore it’s ok I won’t be offended 😂 I’m not super active currently anyway so I get it

tbposting:

roach-works:

someone got really mad at me for being pro-pornography so i’d like to be annoying for a little longer:

-there are enormous problems with exploitation in the porn industry that harm and endanger the people within it, and that harm is carried out mostly against women and minorities

-this is Bad

-however the last century of passing laws against pornography hasn’t actually helped any of those problems, and what sex workers tend to advocate for is the legitimization of their labor, so that they can then access the same protections and regulations that people in other industries can access

-for instance football players, miners, roofers, and warehouse workers are also exploited and endangered by their professions, have to work long hours, and can end up traumatized and disabled by unregulated and unsafe working conditions. these people are used up and thrown away by powerful bosses they can’t individually challenge.

-however because these industries are not de facto illegal to participate in, when these people form unions and demand better working conditions, they can at least fight for their rights.

-sex workers, who engage in heavily stigmatized work that’s also often illegal, have little recourse to demand better treatment.

-even if you don’t like porn, and especially if you don’t like porn, if you care about the women who are exploited in pornography, you need to advocate for the legality of pornography.

-the more illegal the porn industry is, the less safe and fair it is, and people will still be working in it, no matter how illegal it is.

-again: the porn industry should be regulated like any other industry and subject to laws guaranteeing fair compensation for labor, safe working conditions, and legal resources for workers suffering exploitation and abuse.

-once it is legal to do sex work, then women can bring charges against the men who have broken their contracts and abused them.

-and that is why i push back against posts saying that pornography is evil. it is an entertainment product, made by people, to meet an ongoing demand. criminalizing the consumption and production of it may slightly lessen the demand at the incredible cost of endangering everyone involved. and i think that is what’s evil.

This ^

What does not, will never, and CAN NOT help sex workers is pushing them to the margins of society, stigmatized and unsupported, with the police breathing down their necks and at CONSTANT risk of losing their housing, income and social safety nets.

Universal basic income, healthcare, housing, education, labor rights and legal protection, these are the kinds of things which will help sex workers gain autonomy from the industry they are exploited within, same as any literally other worker.

Personally I think sex work is fine, actually, and people should be allowed to do it if they want to, and trying to “eliminate” it is a stupid idea that has consistently failed for all of recorded history, but if you want to reduce the number of people doing sex work, then your political project MUST BE to make sex workers safer, healthier, happier, and more free as sex workers. Only full legal protections and recognition of their status as workers will make it possible to address the structural issues of the industry they work in.

Let me reiterate though: your project must be to make sex workers safer and more free - not the imaginary civilian that you have in your head, the purified person which you are certain the sex worker will definitely become once you have rescued them from their degradation. You have to care for sex workers as human beings AS THEY ARE, HERE AND NOW.

You cannot help sex workers if your only goal is to make them stop existing. If you cannot extend your care to sex workers, but only to the imaginary people you think they ought to be, then you are fundamentally incapable of doing anything to help solve the problems of the sex work industry.

You don’t have to like sex work, you don’t have to encourage it or admire it, but if you want to do a damn thing to help the human beings who do sex work, you have to stop seeing them as a problem to be eliminated and start seeing them as equals who deserve your solidarity.

im going to post old cat images now

beggars-opera:

anarchistmemecollective:

tzikeh:

brunhiddensmusings:

eliteknightcats:

ceiling cat

image

monorail cat

image

long cat

image

the OG can i haz cheezburger cat

image

the lesser known graphix cat

image

invisible bike cat

image

my planet needs me cat

image

cat with the gat

image
image

Good lord we need MOAR of the original LOLCATS (or cat macros, as they were originally known)

image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image

the OG memes

This post is missing Keyboard Cat!!!

image

Originally posted by yeahiwasintheshit

Anonymous

Anonymous asked:

you resisted the forcefemmification beams for too long

paper-mario-wiki:

chongoblog:

Nope. Completely incorrect and wrong.

This is a decision that I made for myself. I made this choice because it’s who I want to be. Not because someone else wanted me to for their own pleasure.

hey to all those people a few months ago in mine and Jenny’s notifs saying “cis guys are so sensitive lol whats wrong with being called a trans girl” i want you to know you actively made it feel less safe for my friend to transition for, quite literally, years. there is a difference between speculating openly about the gender of a fictional character, and the gender of a living human being who has asked people to stop doing so.

you didnt “force open” the egg. you didnt help. you told her “this isnt your choice, nor is it important. what you are is mundane and obvious, and we can all see it. stop pretending.” that isnt encouragement. thats impatient and reductive. that’s childishness. you threw an ideological tantrum when she asked you to stop. you threw a bigger one when other trans girls who actually know her asked you to stop.

you arent her friend. it wasnt your place to speak with familiarity as if you were. you made it more difficult for a public figure to come out as trans, and she was asking you to stop the entire time. that is the irrevocable truth.

there is no universal “best way” to have your egg cracked. if you keep trying to crack eggs that you shouldn’t, youre going to end up with a lot of dead birds who you denied the opportunity to fly, all because you wanted to be in some part responsible for how beautiful you thought it might become.

anonpolls:

What does the grouping of “neurodivergent” include?

only autism and adhd

audhd plus neurocognitive disorders

audhd plus anxiety and depression

audhd plus mood disorders

audhd plus disorders such as Tourette’s and epilepsy

multiple of the above but not all

all of the above/any disorder that affects the brain in any way

See Results

Note from AP: Please remember this is simply a poll of peoples opinions on Tumblr. Lots of sources say different things, and the results do not invalidate any of you!


-submit your poll!-

I feel like definitions for neurodivergence that are super narrow can *sometimes* vere into ableism. I was once told by someone “well a mental illness isn’t a neurodivergency because the whole point is that it’s *not bad*” and as someone that’s bipolar it felt like a huge slap in the face. I don’t think it was necessarily meant as a moral judgement as much as an expression that they didn’t view their AuDHD as a disability, but it still felt like I was being judged. (And I’m not even sure if everyone that has AuDHD experiences it as something that isn’t disabling in some way?)

The especially tricky thing with me is… I’m on Adderall because I experience executive dysfunction. That’s a group of symptoms that is really commonly associated with ADHD (the Wikipedia article about it brings up ADHD a ton) but it can ALSO be symptoms of being bipolar. My brother has ADHD and my uncle had bipolar disorder so there’s genetic history for both disorders in my family–based on what I’ve worked on with doctors I’m convinced I have Bipolar II, but it’s entirely possible I *also* have ADHD. So… Am I only neurodivergent if I officially have ADHD, despite having my experience of the world impacted by most of the same symptoms? Is that label invalid for me if I’m *only* bipolar? (Well, I almost definitely have generalized anxiety disorder too but that’s a whole other thing.)

I guess my point is that there’s often not easy, clear cut borders between different neurological… Things that aren’t “typical.” Based on my experience and limited knowledge, the differences between one diagnosis or another can come down to if you have more symptoms from one list or the other, and they can have a lot of crossover. Regardless on whatever diagnosis/label/what have you I fit with best, accessibility options meant for people with ADHD often work great for me, too. Heck, I even went to college with someone with muscular dystrophy whose eyes lit up when I explained I had executive dysfunction because *he* had that as a symptom for his illness, too.

(there’s also a whole other rant in here about how my experience as a bisexual woman has also shown me how super-limiting categories can often exclude people that can benefit from resources but this is already long so.)

TL;DR: a super-narrow definition of neurodivergent can play into harmful ableist ideology, limits accessibility resources that a broad swath of people can benefit from, and doesn’t fully express the large spectrum of people that experience neurological symptoms that fit under a large variety of diagnosises.

We make Tumblr themes